[myeari]

OK, I understand that the list ignores the players included in the alias (it is a pity, but I will work with that).

But this is not the problem, neither the deletion of a player’s hands (which you did to recreate my results).

I didn’t deleted any player between the two analyses I sent you (200 and 500 losers).

Here is another example attached in two photos.

This time alias include two players (me/hero and Lamarck).

You can see that 500 losers include one winner. So we should guess that there are only 499 losers in the data.

However, when I reanalyze the data with 1000 losers, we see that there are only 2 winners and 998 losers.

Apparently, at least one loser was ignored in the 500 analysis.

And the problem could be much more than one.

So what is going wrong?

Attachments:

1. 

   DriveHUD2_CirMad2Zyw.png
   

2. 

   DriveHUD2_g2Bd7ho1Oq.png
   

[myeari]

I used the same player id for both screen, but this was an alias which includes several players (and not a single player).

If it cannot work correctly with alias, I would be glad to know why and how does the Opponents report decide which opponents to include and which to exclude/ignore when it analyses data of a multiplayers alias?

 

[myeari]

Thank!

I deleted the players but I found out that the filters according to win/lose and the number of opponents work incorrectly.

If for example I select 200 losers players, I would expect to see only those 200 players with the highest lost.

Thus, if I see that there are winners in the end of the list, I would guess that there are less than 200 losers in the data.

But apparently, this is not the case.

See the attached photos. When I selected 200 losers I found one winner in the end. So I guess there are only 199 losers in the data.

But when I selected 500 losers I found 9 winners in the the end. So, there are at lease 491 losers in the data (note that lists are always sorted by lose/win).

And when I selected 1000 losers I found more losers than 491 (cannot show that by photo).

The same goes when I deleted losers. New losers get in the list, which were not there from the beginning.

So what is going on? Why the Opponents report includes winners within the losers list (and vice versa) before it lists all the highest losers?

Why does the Opponents report omit/ignore losers from the losers list (or winners from the winners list) ? and how does it decide which losers (or winners) to include and which to exclude/ignore?

Thanks again!

 

 

Attachments:

1. 

   DriveHUD2_OPae8nyYo9.png
   

2. 

   DriveHUD2_1bCR1qrQuH.png
   

[myeari]

Thanks for you response!

I don’t care to remove the player’s hands completely, so I’m fine with your suggestion.

However, I would need to do that manually, player by player.

Which I will do, if there is no other way.

But my question is whether I can select/filter the players (as whole) that will be selected to the opponent report?

Thanks!

[myeari]

Thanks for your answer.

Clicking the “total hands” stat only sorts the opponents according to their number of hands.

I don’t want to sort, I want to filter.

I would like to have in the opponent report only those players with “total hands > X” (e.g., the report will select those players with more than 500 hands).

Moreover, I don’t just want to delete those from the report, but rather the report will select other players with more hands which did not selected to the first report without the filtering.

Hope I was clear.

Thanks!

[Author]

Posts