Filter opponents

[myeari]

Hi,

Is there anyway to filter opponents or somehow control the opponents that will be selected and presented in the opponent report?

All or most filters filter hands in each opponent.

I’m looking for a way to remove opponents completely (all their hands) from an opponent report.

Is there a way to do so?

Thanks

Meni

 

[EdArguelles]

You can do that but it also remove the hand data of the players playing with that opponent including the hands you played with that player.

If you still plan to remove the hands, right click that player in opponent report and select “switch to this player”, go to overall report and delete the hand history.

[myeari]

Thanks for you response!

I don’t care to remove the player’s hands completely, so I’m fine with your suggestion.

However, I would need to do that manually, player by player.

Which I will do, if there is no other way.

But my question is whether I can select/filter the players (as whole) that will be selected to the opponent report?

Thanks!

[EdArguelles]

You wall have to delete the player data one at a time. We dont have a feature yet to delete selected player data by batch.

As for for filter for opponent report, we can only filter it by win/lose and number of opponent to show.

[myeari]

Thank!

I deleted the players but I found out that the filters according to win/lose and the number of opponents work incorrectly.

If for example I select 200 losers players, I would expect to see only those 200 players with the highest lost.

Thus, if I see that there are winners in the end of the list, I would guess that there are less than 200 losers in the data.

But apparently, this is not the case.

See the attached photos. When I selected 200 losers I found one winner in the end. So I guess there are only 199 losers in the data.

But when I selected 500 losers I found 9 winners in the the end. So, there are at lease 491 losers in the data (note that lists are always sorted by lose/win).

And when I selected 1000 losers I found more losers than 491 (cannot show that by photo).

The same goes when I deleted losers. New losers get in the list, which were not there from the beginning.

So what is going on? Why the Opponents report includes winners within the losers list (and vice versa) before it lists all the highest losers?

Why does the Opponents report omit/ignore losers from the losers list (or winners from the winners list) ? and how does it decide which losers (or winners) to include and which to exclude/ignore?

Thanks again!

 

 

Attachments:

1. 

   DriveHUD2_OPae8nyYo9.png
   

2. 

   DriveHUD2_1bCR1qrQuH.png
   

[EdArguelles]

When you took the 2nd screenshot, did you set your player ID? The only way that the opponent tab will show different result is if you check the oppponet tab using a different player ID.

If you are seeing this result having the same player ID set, please let us know. I’ll have this investigated.

[myeari]

I used the same player id for both screen, but this was an alias which includes several players (and not a single player).

If it cannot work correctly with alias, I would be glad to know why and how does the Opponents report decide which opponents to include and which to exclude/ignore when it analyses data of a multiplayers alias?

 

[EdArguelles]

For Alias with muliple player ID, it ignores the player IDs you have on that alias in opponent report.

I was able to recreate the result that shows in your report.  What I did was, delete a data from a player ID from switching player in my opponent tab then return back to my own player ID.  since I deleted the hand history from that player ID all the hands that player was on the table was removed which change the result of the opponent tab becasue won/lose hands of other player are also removed from the database.

[myeari]

OK, I understand that the list ignores the players included in the alias (it is a pity, but I will work with that).

But this is not the problem, neither the deletion of a player’s hands (which you did to recreate my results).

I didn’t deleted any player between the two analyses I sent you (200 and 500 losers).

Here is another example attached in two photos.

This time alias include two players (me/hero and Lamarck).

You can see that 500 losers include one winner. So we should guess that there are only 499 losers in the data.

However, when I reanalyze the data with 1000 losers, we see that there are only 2 winners and 998 losers.

Apparently, at least one loser was ignored in the 500 analysis.

And the problem could be much more than one.

So what is going wrong?

Attachments:

1. 

   DriveHUD2_CirMad2Zyw.png
   

2. 

   DriveHUD2_g2Bd7ho1Oq.png
   

[EdArguelles]

Strange.. I’ll have this investigated. I attached this forum link to your latest ticket. please wait for our reply.

[Author]

Posts